Religion in 1771 Virginia
by Philippe Halbert,
2005
Introduction
Anglicanism in 18th century Fairfax County, Virginia
Churchgoing
and Sundays
Anglican
Church Taxes, Government, and Administration in Fairfax County
Religion
and the 18th Century Virginian Lower Class
Religion
and Everyday Life in the Virginia Colony
Colonial
Education and Religion
Non-Anglicans
in 18th Century Virginia and Fairfax County
Enslaved
and Free African American Traditions
Conclusion
Further Reading
Introduction
In colonial 18th century
Virginia, most people belonged to the Anglican Church, or Church
of England. The Anglican Church was the established, or official,
church. As the established church, all Virginians were guaranteed
membership, with attendance and taxes mandatory. In addition, other
religious denominations, including Presbyterians, Methodists, Baptists,
and Quakers, established themselves in Virginia during this period.
Providing structure and organization, religion permeated nearly
every aspect of daily life and brought together members of each
social class.
The Anglican Church
was established in Virginia by the Jamestown colonists in 1607.
By the 1720s, it was well organized in the colony, and by 1760 no
parish was without a minister. Nearly one-third of Virginia clergy
was locally born by this time, and most major towns contained at
least one church.
|
Fig. 1.
Churchgoing in the 18th century provided a time for
both public worship and social contact, as this image of Williamsburgs
Bruton Parish Church illustrates.
|
|
Anglicanism
in 18th century Fairfax County, Virginia
There were three Anglican
churches in Fairfax County in the 18th century. These were the Pohick
Church, the Falls Church, and the New or First Church; the Falls
and Pohick Churches still stand today and are active congregations.
The Pohick Church was located in the Truro Parish, and the Falls
and New Churches in the Fairfax Parish. Truro Parish was established
in 1732, and encompassed all of what would become Fairfax and Loudon
counties and a part of Prince William County; the Fairfax Parish
was established in 1765, dividing the Truro Parish. It covered the
town of Alexandria and all of Fairfax County. Both the Truro and
Fairfax parishes became part of the Episcopal Diocese of Virginia
in 1785 when the Anglican Church was disestablished.
The Falls Church was
named for its proximity to the falls of the Potomac River. Begun
ca. 1732 and completed in 1734, the original frame church was greatly
in decay by 1762. In that year, churchwardens George Washington
and George William Fairfax made arrangements for the construction
of a new church in brick. With the creation of the new Fairfax Parish
in 1765, the Falls Church became its parish seat. This proved further
incentive for the construction of a new church, and from 1767 to
1769, Colonel James Wren undertook its construction. In 1771, this
would have been the church occasionally attended by the "farm
family" portrayed at the Claude Moore Colonial Farm. This
living history farm demonstrates life on a tenant farm in Virginia
prior to the American Revolutionary War.
|
|
Fig. 2.
The Falls Church, built 1767-1769. The Falls Church
can be visited today at 115 E. Fairfax Street in Falls Church,
Virginia.
|
The congregation of
the Pohick Church first established itself in the second half of
the 17th century. During this time it built a church near what would
become the town of Colchester on the Occoquan River. In 1732, the
congregation moved near Pohick Creek and built a second church,
a wood frame structure. Construction of a third church two miles
to the south began in 1769, after it had been determined that the
ca. 1732 church was unstable. Local gentleman Daniel French, an
undertaker, or contractor, took over the building project of the
new brick church, which was completed in 1774. Among its parishioners
were the Fairfaxes, the Masons, and the Washingtons.
|
Fig. 3.
The Pohick Church, built 1769-1774. The Pohick Church
can be visited today and is located at 9301 Richmond Highway
in Lorton, Virginia.
|
|
The final church in
Fairfax County was the New or First Church, first documented in
1753. This house of worship was located in or near the town of Alexandria,
founded in 1749. Unlike the other two churches, the New Church was
not a main parish church. Under 18th century terms, it was known
as a chapel of ease. This was a branch church created to accommodate
parishioners living far from the main churches. Unfortunately, no
known images of the New Church survive. In the mid-1760s plans were
made to erect a true church to serve the Alexandrians, and from
1767 to 1773 work was performed on the construction of Christ Church.
|
|
Fig. 4.
A 19th century view of Christ Church, built 1767-1773, with
its bell tower, built 1787-1820 with the addition of galleries.
Courtesy, Historic Christ Church. Christ Church can be visited
today and is located at 118 N. Washington Street in Old Town
Alexandria, Virginia.
|
Churchgoing
and Sundays in Colonial Virginia
In addition to being
a time for prayer, churchgoing was also an important social occasion.
The hour before Sunday worship was the time for exchanging news
and gossip, making business contracts, and meeting friends and family.
In addition, it allowed all social classes to show off
in their finest clothes.
New Jersey-born Philip
Vickers Fithian, tutor to the children of Virginia gentleman Robert
Carter from 1773 to 1774, wrote in his journal
|
|
A Sunday in
Virginia dont seem to wear the same Dress as our Sundays to
the NorthwardGenerally here by five o-clock on Saturday
every Face (especially the Negroes) looks festive and cheerfulAll
the lower class of People, and the Servants, and the Slaves,
consider it as a Day of amusement, and spend it in such Diversions
as they severally choose.
|
|
For the most part,
colonial Virginia churches were simple in exterior appearance. Except
for those in major towns, few churches had bell towers or steeples.
The typical church designs found in Virginia at the time included
the rectangular, the cruciform (in the shape of a Greek cross),
and the deep, an extended version of the rectangular design.
The interior of 18th
century Virginia churches, the sanctuary, called attention to the
social structure of the period. The pulpit, from where the minister
addressed the congregation, was found in the center of the church.
The minister preaching from the pulpit was the central focus. On
the far side of the pulpit stood the altar, and above it, the Ten
Commandments and Apostles Creed, often written on tablets.
Seating in 18th century churches was in the form of box pews. The
high backs of the pews prevented any distraction among churchgoers.
The pews in which the gentry sat were closer to the pulpit and larger
than the others. Men and women sat separately, with the exception
of privileged gentry families who owned their own pews and sat together.
Commoners, free blacks, and slaves sat in the rear of the church,
sometimes on benches pushed to the back or in upstairs galleries.
An excellent example of a colonial Virginia church interior is Christ
Church, on Virginias Northern Neck. Completed in 1735, Christ
Church is the most completely preserved colonial church in Virginia.
It has retained much of its original Georgian architecture and embellishment,
including the only remaining 18th century high-backed box pews in
Virginia.
|
|
Fig. 5.
One of Christ Churchs original 1735 high-backed
pews.
|
After nearly an hour
of socializing, a bell would be rung and congregants would begin
to enter the church. Lower class whites, like our farm family,
blacks, and other women and children entered the church first. The
last to enter were upper class gentleman, who Fithian notes were
often in the process of giving and receiving letters of business,
reading Advertisements, consulting about the price of Tobacco, Grain
&c., and settling the lineage, Age, or quality of favourite
Horses. On entering the church, these men gave the impression
of importance and high standing in the congregation. Fithian writes:
|
|
The Gentlemen
go to Church to be sure, but they make that itself a matter
of convenience, and account the Church a useful weekly resort
to do business
It is not the custom for Gentlemen to
go into Church til Service is beginning, when they enter in
a Body, in the same manner as they come out; I have known
the Clerk to come out and call them into prayers.
|
|
A typical Anglican
worship was divided into four parts, the Morning Prayer (Matins),
the Litany, the Ante Communion, and the Sermon, which made up the
Anglican Divine Service. During the Morning Prayer,
the church clerk read prayers to the congregation from the Common
Book of Prayer, the Anglican missal. Hymns and psalms were also
periodically sung between prayers; musical accompaniment to such
singing was uncommon, although some wealthy, urban congregations
could boast an organ. For the duration of the Litany, prayers and
petitions of the congregation were offered. Communion was celebrated
on average four times a year, during what was known as the Ante
Communion. Because the sacrament was performed very little, most
of the year saw the Ante Communion as preparation for the sermon
that was given near the end of the service. By about 1770 the fashion
was to have short sermons, and most lasted about twenty minutes
and covered topics from Biblical excerpts and political subjects
to metaphysicks. Following the benediction and final
rites, the congregation was dismissed and many spent additional
time mingling outside, ironically often doubling the time spent
socializing than in worship. As Fithian notes
|
|
They stay also after the Service
is over, usually as long, sometimes longer, than the Parson
was preaching.
Fig. 6.
Couple exiting Williamsburgs Bruton Parish Church. Copyright
© Colonial Williamsburg Foundation 2005.
|
Gentry and other upper
class families often hosted dinners following worship on Sundays.
Taking place usually near 2 oclock in the afternoon, dinner
was the largest meal of the day. With extensive household staffs,
local Fairfax County aristocracy and gentry such as the Fairfaxes,
Washingtons, Masons, and Carlyles invited family, friends, and even
the minister to their homes following the conclusion of the service.
|
|
After the service is over
three quarters of an hour is spent in strolling round the
Church among a Crowd, in which time you will be invited
by several different Gentlemen home with them to dinner
I
observe it a general Custom on Sundays here with Gentlemen
to invite one another home to dine, after Church.
Philip Vickers Fithian, 1773
|
|
For families further
down the social ladder, the time after church was spent in much
the same manner as the gentry. Of course they did not entertain
to the extent that did the upper class, but they emulated it to
the best of their ability. On the small farms dotting the landscape
of Fairfax county, farming communities often came together to celebrate
the Sabbath and take a break from the exhausting tasks that made
up farm living. Although generally a day of rest, during crucial
periods of the agricultural year neighbors often came together Sundays
to help with a communal chore, such as a harvest or slaughter, both
economizing time and bringing the community closer together.
|
Fig. 7.
Here, a middling class couple entertains a neighbor
following the conclusion of Sunday worship. Copyright ©
Colonial Williamsburg Foundation 2005.
|
|
The way in which domestic
servants and house slaves spent Sundays depended on their employer
or master or mistress; slaves could attend worship only with their
masters permission. Wealthy gentleman did sometimes bring
along a favorite house slave or servant to church. However, as these
men and women usually entertained in the afternoon, they depended
on their servants, slaves, and other workers to make necessary preparations.
This took away any free time such servants would have been given
on Sundays. When their masters did not entertain, house slaves and
servants were generally given the day off, although they were expected
to perform basic chores.
Plantation slaves
did not usually attend formal worship services. Sunday was given
to these people as a day of rest and a break from chores. Unlike
their counterparts up at the house, they were given the entire day
off and time with which to do as they pleased on Sunday. However,
like their peers working in the masters house, field slaves
required their masters prior permission to attend church services.
Fithian writes that on Sundays these enslaved people would
|
|
commonly spend in fishing
making Potatoes etc., building and patching their Quarters
or rather Cabins.
|
|
Sometimes enslaved
people participated in social gatherings where music, dancing, storytelling,
and socializing took place. Religious ceremonies were often held
at these gatherings. These traditions and rites were often a blend
of Christianity and diverse African religions. Gatherings usually
took place on Saturday nights into Sundays, and were a chance for
slaves to forget their chores and celebrate. Nicholas Cresswell,
an English visitor to America from 1774 to 1777, attended a slave
gathering. In his journal, he wrote how he
|
|
went to a Negro Ball. Sundays
being the only days [they] have to enjoy themselves, they
generally meet together and amuse themselves with dancing
to the Banjo... In their songs they generally relate the
usage they have received from their Masters or Mistresses
in a very satirical stile and manner. Their poetry is like
the MusicRude and uncultivated. Their dancing is most
violent exercise, but so irregular and grotesque. I am not
able to describe it. They all appear to be exceedingly happy
at these merry-makings and seem as if they had forgot or
were not sensible of their miserable condition.
|
|
Many slaves made do
with the outdoor sermons given by traveling preachers. The 1760s
and 1770s saw an increase in the spread of evangelical faiths, especially
those of Baptists and Methodists, among enslaved Africans. William
Lee, of James City County, Virginia, wrote in 1771 how,
|
|
The wandering new light
preachers f[ro]m the North-ward have put most of my Negroes
crazy with their new light and their new Jerusalem.
|
|
The New Light
promise of such preachers was especially meaningful to slaves. It
told of Gods equal love for all mankind, combined with New
Testament themes of deliverance from persecution and ultimate salvation.
Lee, in an effort to stop the spread of the New Light
among his slaves, ordered his overseer to encourage his slaves to
attend services every Sunday at the parish church by giving
those, who are the most common attendants at church, a larger allowance
of food, or an additional shirt more than the rest. In addition,
Lee ordered very exemplary and solemn punishment for
any of his slaves caught attending the meetings of vagabond
preachers, illustrating a common attitude held by followers
of the established church towards dissenting faiths and their followers.
|

|
Fig. 8.
This image depicts a traveling preacher of the late
18th or early 19th century.
|
Anglican
Church Taxes, Government, and Administration in Colonial Fairfax
County
Every colonial household
was required to pay a tax, known as a tithe, to the local Anglican
parish, regardless of its personal religious conviction. Funds brought
in by this taxation were used to pay the minister, maintain the
physical state of the church building, and cover other expenses
accrued by the parish. In addition, parishes augmented their income
with the purchase of a glebe. This was land that could either be
rented or leased to increase parish funds. Most often the minister
and his family inhabited a house, known as a glebe house, located
on the glebe. The cost of living on the glebe was often considered
part of a minister's yearly salary, and when one had not been purchased,
the minister's salary was usually augmented. In the 1760s and 1770s,
Fairfax Parish Minister Townsend Dade was paid a salary of 17,280
pounds of tobacco, which was used as currency or redeemed for transferable
tobacco notes, and due to the lack of a glebe, was paid an additional
500 pounds of the plant.
Tithing required the
yearly donation of ten percent of one's annual income to the local
parish. According to where one lived, one was always a member of
a parish. Tithes were mandatory, regardless of whether one was Anglican
or not. Tithables, or taxable parishioners, began tithing at the
age of sixteen. All free, indentured, and enslaved men were considered
tithable beginning at this age, as were all free and enslaved black
women. White women did not tithe unless they were heads of their
own households or owned and operated their own businesses. For the
farm family, one hundred pounds of tobacco, a tenth of their cash
crop, would go to pay their tithe.
Church
officials also imposed disciplinary action on their parishioners
when necessary. Swearing, blasphemy, adultery, and absence from
worship on Sundays were among the most common violations. Usually
the punishment for these crimes was in the form of a fine, but repeated
offenses could result in public humiliation such as a day in the
stocks or whipping. The following Fairfax Parish Record excerpts
from 1775 and 1778 give an idea of other violations of Anglican
Church statutes and the amounts paid in fines:
| 1775 |
By cash
received of Mr. Wm. Adams, for the serval fines for deer killing
out of season, delivered to him by Bryan Fairfax, £2 10s |
| 1778 |
Received by Lawrence
Monroe, for gaming, £2 10s |
| |
"Received
by Thos. Lewis, for hunting on the Sabbath, 5s
Received by John Lewis, for hunting on the Sabbath, 5s |
All were required
by law to attend Sunday services at least once every four weeks.
The penalty was in the form of a fine of either five shillings or
fifty pounds of tobacco. This was not strictly enforced, however,
and it was not possible for many to attend even the mandatory services.
For example, the "farm family," with its daily chores
and the overall rigor of farm life, would not have found this feasible.
Moreover, weather and conditions of roads were yet another factor
affecting church attendance. Fithian and other Virginia diarists
often write of the snow, wind, and other inclement weather preventing
travel to and from church. Roads in the colony often consisted of
little more than simple dirt paths, and for the "farm family"
and others, travel to church on foot or wagon would have taken a
considerable amount of time. From the vestry records, however, ministers
often preached to full congregations most Sundays. As gentry and
more affluent people made up only a small percentage of any congregation,
it appears more middling and lower class people did make the effort
to attend as often as possible.
Unlike in England,
there were no bishops, church courts, or other centralized seats
of clerical authority in Virginia. The colony was not a part of
an English diocese or even a diocese in itself. Although loosely
under the jurisdiction of the bishop of London during the period,
the church vestry was Virginias dominant religious institution.
A lay group, conformable to the doctrine and discipline of
the Church of England, as by the law established, the vestry
was originally appointed by its respective colonys government.
In 1662 this changed, and vestrymen gained the right to fill in
vacancies on their own. This practice, known as cooptation, led
to the office staying in the hands of a few elite families. In fact,
the lack of American bishops was due to the vestries. Any attempt
at centralizing ecclesiastic authority would have undermined the
power of parish vestries. In the 1760s and 1770s, the movement to
install a bishop in the American colonies was met with opposition,
as illustrated by the 1769 engraving in Fig. 9. A mob holding the
works of enlightened 17th century thinker John Locke has formed.
Railing against lords temporal or spiritual, they force
the bishop packing back to his ship.
Fig. 9.
An attempt to land a bishop in America, 1769. Courtesy, The
John Carter Brown Library at Brown University. |
|
Responsibilities
of the vestry included hiring a parish minister and paying his salary,
keeping a register of births and deaths within their parish, assigning
seats in church, levying dues to fund church upkeep, furnishing,
and construction, and overseeing the distribution of relief for
needy parishioners. In addition, the vestry managed the "processioning,"
or surveying, of all land boundaries in their parish.
Excerpts from the Lynnhaven Parish records for 1754 give an idea
as to the sort of relief performed by 18th century Virginia vestries:
"To Elizabeth Oliver [for] keeping Mary
Oliver's child: 400 pounds of tobacco...
To Anne Norrice [for] keeping Duncan King's child: 160 pounds of
tobacco
To Mary Morris for her Relief: 480 pounds of tobacco
"
The total expenditures in relief of the Lynnhaven Parish for the
year 1754, including those above, totaled 11,687 pounds of tobacco
obtained from the parish's tithes. The Fairfax Parish Vestry assumed
similar undertakings. One interesting example is when in 1770, Vestryman
Townsend Dade, Sr., paid twenty-four pounds of tobacco for "the
sitting of a poor man over the ferry."
In 1771, the vestry of the Fairfax Parish included:
| *William Payne, Jr. |
Edward Duling |
Townsend Dade, Sr. |
| John West |
Richard Sanford |
Charles Broadwater |
| *William Adams |
Daniel French |
James Wren |
| John Dalton |
Thomas Shaw |
Henry Gunnel |
*Churchwardens were William Payne, Jr., and William Adams. As such,
they were responsible especially for parish property and alms, and
were at the head of the vestry.
The vestrymen who served the Truro Parish in 1771 were:
| *George William Fairfax |
George Mason |
Alexander Henderson |
| William Gardner |
Peter Wagener |
Thomas Ellzey |
| *Edward Payne |
Daniel McCarty |
|
| Thomas Ford |
Martin Cockburn |
|
*Churchwardens were George William Fairfax and Edward Payne.
The ministers
of Virginia churches, like the vestry, also had many responsibilities.
Administering of sacraments and tasks such as catechism, counsel,
and burial all fell to the minister. By the late 1750s, one-third
of the ministers in Virginia were born in the colony, with the rest
usually Englishmen and Scotsmen educated at British schools. Of
the Virginia-born ministers, some were educated within the colonies,
often at seminaries affiliated with present universities such as
William and Mary, Harvard, and Yale. Others were also educated in
Britain. In colonial America, the appointment of Anglican ministers
was renewed yearly unlike in England, where the minister was permanent
rector. Candidates for Holy Orders, or the rite of becoming ordained
a minister, were to have "taken some degree of school
or
at least, be able to yield an account of his Faith in Latin, according
to the Articles of Religion." To officiate as a minister required
the above ordination and proof of a college level education, seriousness
of purpose, knowledge of scripture and articles of faith, or good
character at the least.
In
1771, the minister of the Falls Church and Fairfax Parish was the
Reverend Mr. Townsend Dade.
In 1771, the minister
of the Pohick Church and Truro Parish was the Reverend Mr. Lee Massey.
|
|
Fig 10.
An Anglican minister delivering a sermon.
Copyright © Colonial Williamsburg Foundation 2005. |
Taking
on many of the duties of a bishop's ordinary, or executive, the
royal governor of the colony was also another prominent figure in
Virginia's religious administration. He held the power to examine
the letters of ordination of incoming ministers, grant security
of employment to recommended clergy, assign them to congregations
where a minister had not yet been assigned by the vestry, issue
marriage licenses, and probate wills and final testaments. Any disputes
or conflicts within a congregation went to the governor, not a bishop,
strengthening his power and will. At the start of 1771 the Virginia
colony was without a formal royal governor; Governor Botetourt,
governor since 1768, had unexpectedly died in office in late 1770.
William Nelson, a Norfolk merchant and senior member of the late
governor's council, was appointed acting governor. He stayed in
office until September of 1771, when Lord Dunmore, Virginia's last
royal governor, assumed office.
The General
Assembly, the colony's legislative body, also played a part in the
administration of the Anglican Church in Virginia. In addition to
establishing parishes and their geographic boundaries, setting ministers'
salaries, and enacting laws and decrees in keeping with Anglican
doctrine, the General Assembly kept vestries in check, dissolving
them when it could be proved that they were not doing their duty
or abusing their privileges.
17th
century Virginia's General Assembly saw the creation of sixty-one
parishes. The following listing shows the number of parishes created
every ten years from 1700 to 1780 (from Charles Francis Cocke's
Parish Lines, Dioceses of Southwestern Virginia.)
| 1700-1709: |
4 |
1710-1719: |
2 |
| 1720-1729: |
6 |
1730-1739: |
10 |
| 1740-1749: |
10 |
1750-1759: |
7 |
| 1760-1769: |
10 |
1770-1780: |
14 |
In total, the number of parishes created from 1700 to 1780 numbered
sixty-three.
Religion
and the 18th century Virginian Lower Class
In the case of the
free lower class in 18th century Virginia, such as the farm family,
there is little documentation of their religious lives. These people
were in most cases illiterate to semi-literate, and as such had
little means of having their voices heard. The Anglican Church was
strictly ordered by a hierarchy of gentry and other leading men,
both in America and England; this might have been a factor deterring
lower class people from attending worship on Sunday. For the most
part, Anglican ministers catered to the needs of their gentry and
more affluent congregants. This left poorer whites and enslaved
and free Africans, who made up the majority of both the congregation
and colonies' populations, without spiritual attention.
Religion
and Everyday Life in the Virginia Colony
Religion
in colonial Virginia was one of the sole aspects of life in which
all of society shared and took part. All participated in religious
worship on Sunday, and religious rites of passage such as christenings,
marriage, and burial paralleled with the lives of every person,
slave to gentleman, from birth to death. The first sacrament, baptism,
took place several days after birth. The minister performed the
christening ceremony at church, and more often at home, as the family
and sometimes a few friends and neighbors looked on. Significant
not only for the child, the rite established a sense of responsibility
for its parents. At the time the child was christened, godparents
were also chosen. These were usually siblings, or sometimes a close
friend of the family, and the role of spiritual guardian to the
newly baptized child fell to them. Following the christening ceremony,
there was usually a celebration at the parents' home.
Marriage, while not
recognized as a sacrament in the Anglican Church, was nonetheless
an important step in people's lives during the period. It took place
either at the church or at home, usually that of the bride. It appears
that by the mid-18th century, fashionable people of English backgrounds
were choosing more and more to marry at home. In the early 1780s,
English novelist Ms. Fanny Burney wrote in her diary that, "of
all things in the world I don't suppose anything could be so dreadful
as a public wedding
I should never be able to support it."
The poor, however, continued to marry at church. The Reverend Mr.
Hugh Jones, an Anglican minister from England and mathematics professor
at William and Mary, wrote in the 1720s that in Virginia,
"In houses there is occasion
to
baptize children
In houses they most commonly marry, without
regard to the time of day or season of the year."
The Reverend Mr. Jones frequently complained of the difficulty
of presiding over weddings and burials in Virginia, finding fault
with Virginians' insistence of holding such ceremonies at their
homes. One option in getting married was the public proclamation
of banns, either at church or home. Another was to acquire a formal
marriage license, obtainable from the governor. This was followed
by a ceremony at either church or home. Both choices were officially
recognized in the eyes of the Anglican Church.
|
Fig. 11.
William Hogarth, Detail of The Wedding of Stephen Beckingham
and Mary Cox, ca. 1729. This early 18th century painting depicts
a wedding ceremony as it would have been performed in a church
setting. The overall order of the ceremony had changed little,
if at all, by the 1770s.
|
|
|
An alternative to
marriage banns and licenses was known as a Fleet Wedding, after
London's Fleet Prison for debtors where so many such unions occurred.
The custom developed due to the cost of marriage licenses and wedding
ceremonies. A Fleet Wedding fee was negotiable, and they were popular
with the lower class because of this. In addition, no formal witness
was required for a Fleet Wedding. These informal marriages, while
not recognized by the Church, were not unacceptable in society.
They did not require the calling of banns or the consent of a third
party, such as a parent, military officer, magistrate, or other
important figure, did not require a witness, and could be performed
anywhere and by anyone. Such weddings were outlawed in England in
1754 with the passage of the Marriage Act; the Act did not apply
in Scotland. The practice however undoubtedly continued without
the knowledge of the authorities in England, as well as the American
colonies.
Death and religion
were also closely intertwined. Though the funerary ceremony for
Lord Botetourt in 1770 took place at Bruton Parish Church and continued
on to the Wren Chapel, Virginians for the most part held funerals
and burial services at their own homes instead of at a church as
was done in England. Prayers were read aloud at the burial service
and a sermon was read, costing forty shillings. With regard to burial,
Reverend Jones says,
"It is customary here to bury in
gardens and orchards, where whole families lye interred together,
in a spot handsomely enclosed, planted with evergreens, and the
graves kept decently
In houses, where at funerals are assembled
a great congregation of neighbors and friends
"
Philip Vickers Fithian adds,
"I understand only the lower sort
of people are buried at Church; for the Gentlemen have private burying-yards."
In fact, many upper class families did own their own private burying
plots. Those of the Lees at Stratford Hall and the Masons at Gunston
Hall exist today, as do those of the Custis and Taliaferro families
at their properties in Williamsburg. However, some, such as the
Carters, and royal governors Edward Nott and Francis Fauquier, were
buried in their churchyards at Christ Church on the Northern Neck
and Bruton Parish Church in Williamsburg.
It is important to note the difference between burials and funerals
during the period. Burials were a more somber affair and carried
a more religious tone. They were held shortly after death. Immediate
family generally attended the burial of small children and younger
people, whereas more extended family and neighbors were often present
at those of adults. Funerals, however, took place several weeks
after the passing and were attended by many and marked by celebration.
These were often held at the home of the deceased or that of their
family, apparently in the evening. A Mrs. Browne accompanied her
brother, an officer under General Edward Braddock, to Alexandria
in 1755, a few months before the ill-fated Braddock Expedition.
Staying several months in Alexandria, she noted in her diary May
29, 1755, that she
"received a note from Mrs. Salkeldat
[who]
desired my Company to her husband's Funeral
He had been dead
a Month. It is the custom of this Place to bury their relations
in their Gardens."
|
|
|
Fig. 12.
A ca. mid-18th century French engraving depicting an upper
class English burial. Copyright © Colonial Williamsburg
Foundation 2005.
|
According to recent studies, the rate of a poor person's funeral
in mid-18th century London might cost £15, an important investment,
whereas that of more middling people was on average £100.
Colonial
Education and Religion
Education in the 18th
century was closely identified with religion. For most, formal education
at a school or university was impossible; necessary education was
carried out at home, by tutors in upper class households and by
most children's "learning by doing" on a day-to-day basis.
Of this education, catechism, or religious instruction, was a fundamental
element. Knowledge of Biblical text, such as important stories,
proverbs, psalms, and prayers was essential, and a Bible served
as the catechistic "textbook." In their journals, Virginia
plantation tutors such as Philip Vickers Fithian and John Harrower
recount having catechized the children under their instruction with
memorization and recital of prayers and scripture. Many families,
however, were illiterate and did not own Bibles. An example would
be the farm family. For families like this, one of the only opportunities
to practice their catechism was at church on Sundays. In addition,
most parents would have heard the more familiar stories of the Old
and New Testaments, such as Creation, the Flood Story, David and
Goliath, and the various stories and parables of Jesus Christ, and
would have shared them with their children. Families of all social
classes would have known prayers such as the Our Father, Apostle's
Creed, and grace at meals. According to Fithian, before meals it
was usual
"to 'say Grace' as they call it;
which is always express'd by the People in the following words,
'God bless us in what we are to receive'-and after Dinner, 'God
make us thankful for His mercies."
|
|
Fig. 13. Saying Grace, ca. 1730, J. van Aken.
Here a common family says grace before their meal. It is interesting
to note that despite their poverty, the family still makes use
of a table cloth. Courtesy the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford. |
At the Virginia colony's
only institution for higher learning, the College of William and
Mary, religion was of supreme importance. When the General Assembly
first proposed the idea of a Virginia college in 1661, the foremost
reason advanced in the call for its establishment was "the
want for able and faithfull ministers." In the early 1690s,
the Assembly sent the Reverend James Blair to England, where in
1693 he was able to successfully persuade King William and Queen
Mary to grant the charter that would establish the College of William
and Mary. Most of the college's faculty consisted of ordained Anglican
ministers, and its chancellors were Bishops of London. 1729 saw
the addition of a chapel to the College, with its first service
held in 1732. Grammar, arithmetic, and classical studies were complemented
by courses in moral philosophy and divinity, and students were often
read sermons and biblical passages.
William and Mary had
also been established as a means by which to promulgate Anglicanism
among Americas native inhabitants. Beginning in the early
1700s, a school was being run by professors of the College for this
express purpose. Across the Atlantic, English scientist Robert Boyle
had stipulated in his will that part of his Brafferton estates
profits be left to a pious and Christian endeavor. Reverend Blair
was able to convince Boyles executors that the Indian school
at William and Mary was a perfect project, and in 1723 funds from
the estate resulted in the construction of a brick school building
named the Brafferton. Its goal was to educate boys of Virginia's
remaining American Indian tribes and to send them back to their
people as Christian missionaries. Many came from the western part
of the colony from such tribes as the Catawba, Cherokee, and Tuscarora.
After converting their pupils to Anglicanism, it was the professors'
hope that they would return to their people as missionaries, reconciling
differences and gaining valuable alliances for the colony. Brafferton
pupils learned to read and write, but emphasis was placed on their
understanding of the Bible and teachings of the Anglican Church.
Unfortunately for the professors, their native pupils returned home
to their people and traditions, eventually forgetting what they
had learned. The experiment in educating American Indians for such
purposes repeatedly floundered, and by 1775 only one student remained.
The school was eventually shut down four years later in 1779.
At the Williamsburg
Bray School, one of the first efforts in educating black children
in America was attempted. This was one of several schools in the
colonies, all known as Bray Schools, founded for free and enslaved
black children and funded by an English philanthropist, Mr. Bray.
Under the direction of a Mrs. Anne Wager from 1760 to 1774, the
Bray School accentuated "speaking, cleanliness, and obedience,"
as well as some reading, writing, and arithmetic; however the main
focus of the school was the catechism of the Anglican Church, including
how to read the Bible and say prayers.
|
|
Fig. 14.
Copyright © Colonial Williamsburg Foundation 2005. |
Non-Anglicans
in 18th century Virginia and Fairfax County
In addition to Anglicans,
people of diverse faiths made Virginia their home during the colonial
period. Although the majority of colonial Virginia was Anglican,
by 1771 there were growing numbers of non-Anglican Protestants residing
in and establishing congregations in the colony. Roman Catholics
and Jews, very small minorities in Virginia during the colonial
period, did not form their own congregations until after the Revolution.
In addition to the predominant Christianity, the remaining few Native
Americans followed traditional beliefs and rituals, and some enslaved
Africans intermingled within their adopted Christian faith cherished
spiritual beliefs they had brought with them from Africa.
As there were no Anglican
bishops to aggressively enforce Anglicanism throughout Virginia,
many Protestant dissenters, or non-Anglican Protestants, found refuge
there. Among these were Baptists, Methodists, Presbyterians, and
Quakers. As non-Anglicans, followers of these dissenting faiths
could not worship or preach publicly without formal authorization
or license from and registration with the colony's legislature.
In fact, as by law members of the legislature were required to be
Anglican, this made it for the most part hesitant at permitting
the formal organization of such faiths (note: two exceptions to
this rule occurred, first in the late 17th century when a Catholic
Mr. Brent joined the Assembly to better represent Northern Virginia,
and again in the 1760s and 1770s when the legislature decided to
admit a few backwoods Presbyterians into their ranks for the same
purpose.) Usually, these groups made do with worshiping in private
homes. However, even after having been granted official authorization
to erect true houses of worship, non-Anglican colonists were received
with opposition by many. As a contributor to the Virginia Gazette,
who called himself Luther, submitted in November of 1775,
"No dissenter can complain as long
as they are permitted free exercise of their religion, without molestation;
but when their strides evidently tend to secure establishment in
their favor, they need not wonder if they are opposed by all who
prefer the present establishment to them."
|
Fig. 15.
A Presbyterian Minister delivers a sermon. Notice the stark
appearance of the interior of the meetinghouse, quite unlike
what was found in Anglican churches, as seen in Figs. 9.and
11. Copyright © Colonial Williamsburg Foundation 2005.
|
|
|
Edwin S. Gaustad's Historical Atlas of Religion in America, 1962,
shows the number and location of major churches in North America
in 1750. This extract interprets the number of major churches in
Virginia.
Location of Major Churches in North America, 1750:
| |
Anglican |
Presbyterian |
Lutheran |
Reformed |
Baptist |
Congregational |
Catholic |
Jewish |
| Virginia |
96 |
17 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
The table gives a good idea of the religious diversity present
in Virginia by the mid-18th century. By 1771, there were still no
Catholic or Congregational churches or Jewish synagogues in Virginia.
The numbers shown for the other churches increased somewhat by 1771.
The first great surge
of non-Anglican Protestantism in Virginia came in the 1730s and
1740s with what is known as the Great Awakening. This religious
movement began with New England Congregational Minister Jonathan
Edwards and spread to affect all the American colonies. Well known
for his sermon, "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,"
Reverend Edwards sought a return to the traditional Calvinist roots
of the Reformed Church. In addition, the English George Whitefield,
himself an Anglican minister and later a Methodist leader, also
spearheaded the Great Awakening throughout the colonies beginning
in 1738. Both powerful speakers, the Reverends Edwards and Whitefield
drew large crowds at their traveling, outdoor sermons. Their dramatic
and emotional style brought many to believe the tenets of the Great
Awakening and shaped popular attitudes towards religion. For the
most part, Anglicanism showed religion to be something marked by
visible display, spectacle, and passive listening. In contrast,
the Great Awakening showed religion to be something more personal
and private. Its followers, the "New Lights," began to
study the Bible at home and actively discuss its passages and meanings.
In effect, the Great Awakening paved the way for the coming and
emergence of dissenting sects in the colonies.
|
|
Fig. 16. Jonathan Edwards 1703-1758 |
There were no non-Anglican
houses of worship in Fairfax County until a Presbyterian Meetinghouse
was built in Alexandria. Presbyterians were forbidden to meet publicly,
but could worship in private homes. By 1760, when the restraints
on Presbyterians had been lifted, Alexandria's Presbyterian community
was worshiping at the "Town House," part of the courthouse
on the town's market square. Known as the Presbyterian Society,
in 1772 they were recognized as an organized church by the Donegal
Presbytery and assigned Pastor William Thom, sometimes spelled Them.
This recognition led the congregation to build their own house of
worship. Funded by the town's large population of Scots, the meetinghouse
was completed in 1774. Among its congregation were Dr. James Craik,
physician to George Washington, and merchant John Carlyle, who managed
the meetinghouse's construction and served as an Elder beginning
in 1775.
Carlyle is a unique
example among Protestant dissenters in Virginia during the period.
He arrived in Virginia ca. 1740 as an apprentice merchant. By the
mid-1740s, he had established himself in the area that would soon
become Alexandria, which he helped found in 1749. In the 1749/50
List of Tithables compiled by Truro Parish Minster Charles Green,
Carlyle was recorded as a Presbyterian. Like all non-Anglicans,
he was expected to practice his religion discreetly, if at all.
Marrying Sarah Fairfax, a daughter of William Fairfax and related
to Lord Fairfax, in 1747, he was wed by an Anglican minister. During
the time it was unlawful for Presbyterians to meet, Carlyle declared
his religious preference, but participated in Anglican Church services.
His family attended the New Church, Christ Church, Presbyterian
services held at the courthouse, and later the Presbyterian Meetinghouse.
He also bought an expensive pew in Christ Church. A high-standing
individual in Alexandria and the surrounding area, Carlyle served
the community as a justice, colonel, and commissary. He was obviously
on good terms with the local Anglican vestry; as a Presbyterian
it was by law illegal for him to hold such offices, although he
is recorded as having sworn an Anglican oath. As evidence of his
good standing with Church authorities, he was requested by the Fairfax
Parish vestry to take over the final construction of Christ Church
in 1772. In addition, he was never recorded as having been charged
the fine imposed on those who failed to attend Anglican Church services.
Fig. 17.
John Carlyle, by John Hesselius,
1766. Courtesy of Sir Charles McLean.
|
|
Enslaved
and Free African American Traditions
People of African
descent composed a large part of Virginia's population during the
18th century. By 1774, nearly half of Williamsburg's population
was black, and in northern Alexandria so was almost a quarter. By
1775, 20% of the thirteen colonies' population was black, with 8%
of this number free, and in 1776, 40% of Virginia's population was
black. Introduced to Christianity upon their earliest arrival in
1619 at Jamestown, Virginia, many of these Africans were willing
converts. Aspects of Christianity, including a supreme being, creation
myths, priest-healers, and moral systems, paralleled with the varied
cults and religions of West Africa, where most enslaved people came
from. By the late 17th century, when the institution of slavery
was well established, many enslaved Africans had found hope in Anglican
Church doctrine and in passages they heard from traveling evangelical
preachers. Some established their own religious congregations; the
first of these was established in 1758, on William Byrd III's plantation
on the Bluestone River in Lunenburg County, Virginia. Blending this
new faith with those they had brought with them from Africa, a unique
religious experience in America began, and would continue to develop
into the 19th century.
|
|
|
Fig. 18.
The Old Plantation, ca. late 18th century, by an unknown artist,
depicts the degree to which native African traditions became
infused in American slave culture. Aspects of traditional
dress, musical instruments, and rituals are all present. The
paper on which the painting was done can be dated 1777 to
1794 by the papermaker's watermark, and it is believed that
the scene is of a South Carolina plantation painted between
1790 and 1800. Copyright © Colonial Williamsburg Foundation
2005.
|
Conclusion
In conclusion, religion
permeated nearly every aspect of daily life during the colonial
period. It brought together members of each social class, and was
an integral part in their lives. From birth to death, religion played
a central role. Although the established church was the Church of
England, people of diverse faiths made Virginia their home. However,
as the official church, Anglicanism imposed its doctrine and laws
on all in the colony. In the end, the call for freedom of worship
would in part spark the American War for Independence and bring
the disestablishment of the colonial Anglican Church in the 1780s.
**Note: any reference to the "farm
family" refers to the fictional 1771 family portrayed at the
Claude Moore Colonial Farm. This "family" represents typical
low-income tenant farmers in Northern Virginia just prior to the
American Revolution. For more information, see the Farm's website
at www.1771.org.
Many thanks to Colonial
Williamsburg for kindly allowing the use of their images.
Further
Reading:
Carson, Cary, ed. Becoming Americans: Our Struggle to be Both
Free and Equal. Williamsburg: the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation,
2002.
Fischer, David Hackett. Albions Seed: Four British Folkways
in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Fithian, Philip Vickers. Journal and Letters of Philip Vickers
Fithian 1773-1774: A Plantation Tutor. Ed. Hunter Farish. Charlottesville:
University Press of Virginia, 1968.
Gaustad, Edwin S. Historical atlas of religion in America.
New York: Oxford University Press, 1962.
Isaac, Rhys. The Transformation of Virginia: 1740-1790.
Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1999.
McKim, Rev. R.H. Washington's Church: An Historical Sketch of
Old Christ Church, Alexandria, Virginia. Originally published
in Alexandria, 1886. Reprinted Alexandria, VA: Historic Christ Church,
1998.
Mitchell, Beth. Fairfax County Virginia, in 1760: An Interpretive
Historical Map. Fairfax: Fairfax County Office of Comprehensive
Planning, 1987.
Morgan, Philip D. Slave Counterpoint: Black Culture in the Eighteenth-Century
Chesapeake and Lowcountry. Chapel Hill: The University of North
Carolina Press, 1998.
Munson, James D. Col. John Carlyle, Gent., a True and Just Account
of the Man and His House. Fairfax: The Northern Virginia Regional
Park Authority, 1986.
Nelson, John K. A Blessed Company: Parishes, Parsons, and Parishioners
in Anglican Virginia, 1690-1776. Chapel Hill: University of
North Carolina Press, 2002.
Picard, Liza. Dr. Johnson's London: Coffee-Houses and Climbing
Boys, Medicine, Toothpaste and Gin, Poverty and Press-Gangs, Freakshows
and Female Education. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2002.
Smith, Daniel Blake. Inside the Great House: Planter Family
Life in Eighteenth-Century Chesapeake Society. Ithaca: Cornell
University Press, 1986.
Upton, Dell. Holy Things and Profane: Anglican Parish Churches
in Colonial Virginia. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.
|